Hey, if that's how he feels then there's no reason to hold him back. I much prefer an overt challenge of character to sniping behind my back when I'm not on...assuming one defers the other. People tell me I'm cynical for making negative base assumptions about people and their motivations in general, so I'm going to say that it does just so I have a counterexample...but in reality I know both go on since everyone's always ready to dig their least favorite user in public and private, having seen others, and myself, do this before. At least this way I know on what grounds the personal attacks are on. And it's not as though I'm offended by what he says, or this impacts me in the slightest. This isn't sarcasm, really; I'm not nearly so emotional as other people.
Anyways I would love a detailed explanation as to why [I AM A JACKASS. As previously stated I'm not going to get mad as most would. I merely challenge you to defend a point with a nominal degree of vim and vigor which seems to be absent in most discussions. Assume I am retarded and justify your assertion. Construct a lucid picture using examples. I want to see proof you can. I'm tired of seeing an elipsis in response to something someone says with no further comment. We don't all think like you, and are not seeing a fallacious statement you think you've picked up on. If you expand upon your initial knee-jerk reaction you may well convince others you are of sound mind and able to make deeper inferences. These same others who would think you're objecting to a given idea just because you don't like someone. By not saying anything, you make yourself look worse. If you actually pour out what your thinking for everyone to see, they'll recognize you as more than a shallow entity, which I assure you is the immediate perception for an unexplained view posited before due contemplation.
So go ahead.
Failing a response, as people don't like to stand behind what they say, let's turn this into a one-dimensional "point out everything wrong with genus" thread. Failing a response, I will add you to this list.
People who Don't Support what they Say*
1) Psyborg
2) ...and growing.
*Note that this list is to be a clean slate since yesterday. I decided I'll be more analytical in my judgement of people, and not just discard them as lackluster based on a few undesirable traits. Maybe someone surprises me by being complex, and entirely defies any former assessment of their person. I'm not counting on it, but maybe some of you only seem like cardboard cutouts and are actually enigmatic to the core. The interesting sorts on the site tend to strike me as interesting off the bat immediately though...I wouldn't bet on any horses I've thrown to the wind as 'wowing' me though. And it's not just because of personal bias. If I think you are boring, you are in fact boring. You can't claim beauty is in the eye of the beholder, or other superficial nonsense. Some people just don't have redeeming qualities. Some people have absolutely nothing going for them as people. You could be one of them. Learn to deal with it. Find what you do best and do nothing else for the rest of your life. You'll better serve society that way. Since right now you just look like dead weight, as everyone is seeing you out of your single element.
So go ahead.
