Author Topic: Significance of score submissions (Read 18036 times)

General Throatstomper · « **on:** July 25, 2004, 11:08:12 pm »

I think that score submissions be given weight in the rankings. Score is just as important as speed in many games-in some, its actually more important (a sub-2 minute Radical Highway doesn't always mean an 'A' rank). It requires a lot of skill to get a good score, and time isn't always the biggest factor in it. Score should be given an equal part in the rankings, so that a great score doesn't just give you a useless record. It involves just as much strategy as time-attacking, so it should be added to the rankings.

sonicam · « **Reply #1 on:** July 26, 2004, 01:34:06 am »

I agree with you, Blue Blaze.

Rolken · « **Reply #2 on:** July 26, 2004, 10:50:58 am »

Wow, I'm surprised there's so much support for it. Hm!

Bilan · « **Reply #3 on:** July 26, 2004, 02:25:03 pm »

*agrees*

Shadow Wedge · « **Reply #4 on:** July 27, 2004, 12:59:15 pm »

I agree as well.

Jeffery Mewtamer · « **Reply #5 on:** July 27, 2004, 04:40:15 pm »

I so want score to make have some importance. I am tired of having no reason to try and improve at Sadv2 in the score department, and some of my best scores(such as 65*** on leaf forest 1 with sonic, if someone broke 30 seconds a score of 90,000 would be almost granteed).

Taco · « **Reply #6 on:** July 27, 2004, 04:44:32 pm »

gah

so close I am

I need to shave off 67 centiseconds

:(

EDIT: hurray! got under 30 seconds :) It will be hard to reproduce again though...

shadowgamer196 · « **Reply #7 on:** September 02, 2004, 04:14:16 pm »

No don't do that! That's wrong you know! Well at least thats what i think, it's a time attack site, if score will count in the rankings it will mess things up. Now there could be different cattagories like a Champ of the times in a game and a Champ of Ring/Score in that game. That would be better IMO.

sonicam · « **Reply #8 on:** September 02, 2004, 04:18:58 pm »

Quote

No don't do that! That's wrong you know! Well at least thats what i think, it's a time attack site, if score will count in the rankings it will mess things up. Now there could be different cattagories like a Champ of the times in a game and a Champ of Ring/Score in that game. That would be better IMO.
[snapback]4444[/snapback]

If you do that then Rings and Scores should be seperate. Hmmm, not many people seem to think score attack takes any skill, but it does. And don't forget Bosses.

General Throatstomper · « **Reply #9 on:** September 03, 2004, 11:55:57 am »

Quote from: sonicam,Sep 2 2004, 04:18 PM

[
[snapback]4444[/snapback]

If you do that then Rings and Scores should be seperate. Hmmm, not many people seem to think score attack takes any skill, but it does. And don't forget Bosses.

[snapback]4445[/snapback]

[/quote]
Yes, score attacking bosses. My score of 93,000+ on Robot Storm finally has a purpose :D

qubit · « **Reply #10 on:** September 25, 2004, 03:03:16 pm »

I completely agree with blueblaze. Good going pressuring Rolken!

Bilan · « **Reply #11 on:** September 25, 2004, 04:27:12 pm »

So is score actually being added?...

If so i gotta work on my Advance 2 scores =)

Rolken · « **Reply #12 on:** September 25, 2004, 07:43:59 pm »

Yeah.

Bilan · « **Reply #13 on:** September 25, 2004, 07:48:17 pm »

W00T! *goes Score Attacking*

Significance of score submissions

The Sonic Center > Forum > Welcome Center > Information Kiosk > Significance of score submissions

Poll

Should score submissions be given significance in the rankings?